Thursday 26 February 2015

Nonfiction Essay Writing


Chiune Sugihara

Listen to this story and take notes. After the story has concluded you will have 10 minutes to write a short, one page essay about the tale. This exercise is designed to encourage the skills necessary for success on the nonfiction paper.


Tuesday 24 February 2015

Metaphors We Live By

Brain Drop: Is life a journey?




Metaphors will be littered throughout your selected nonfiction texts. Try identifying some metaphors from the three short nonfiction texts we looked at in class. After identifying the source and target, wax philosophical about what the metaphor does rhetorically. What sort of picture does the metaphor paint in your head? Refer to our discussions on aesthetics, voice, and style.

For those of you who were not here on Wednesday, please print out and complete the text below:



Name:

Period:                                                                                                                        

Find the Metaphor

Trail by Fire

1)      By now, both investigators had a clear vision of what had happened. Someone had poured liquid accelerant throughout the children’s room, even under their beds, then poured some more along the adjoining hallway and out the front door, creating a “fire barrier” that prevented anyone from escaping; similarly, a prosecutor later suggested, the refrigerator in the kitchen had been moved to block the back-door exit.

 

Metaphor:

Source:

Target:

What does this metaphor do?

 

2)      Dozens of studies have shown that witnesses’ memories of events often change when they are supplied with new contextual information. Itiel Dror, a cognitive psychologist who has done extensive research on eyewitness and expert testimony in criminal investigations, told me, “The mind is not a passive machine. Once you believe in something—once you expect something—it changes the way you perceive information and the way your memory recalls it.”

 

Metaphor:

Source:

Target:

What does this metaphor do?

 

3)      She wrote to Webb, who said that she could see him, and they met in the prison visiting room. A man in his late twenties, he had pallid skin and a closely shaved head; his eyes were jumpy, and his entire body seemed to tremble. A reporter who once met him described him to me as “nervous as a cat around rocking chairs.”

 

Metaphor:

Source:

Target:

What does this metaphor do?

Nick Cave

4)      This is Cave at his best, creating new mythology out of 20th Century pop culture fragments; at turns saucer eyed with terror and then chisel faced with threat like Harry Powell, the tattooed preacher from Night Of The Hunter. The Bad Seeds stripped down to Harvey, Bargeld and Adamson sounded as hungry as they looked.

 

Metaphor:

Source:

Target:

What does this metaphor do?

 

5)      The first album From Her To Eternity was tune parched and pulsed like a migraine but was not a collection of dirges by any stretch of the imagination. The band showed immense restraint, creating acres of space between a clicking snare, the occasional baroque organ flourish and the creaking scrape of sweaty guitar strings. Cave swelled to fill this space like a recently summoned demon. He was the man of many voices. He crooned, wailed, warbled, wheedled, pleaded, hectored, admonished, raved, spluttered and shouted. His true offspring isn't Gerard Way or some other emo sheep in goth wolf's clothing but in fact Li'l Wayne. Cave is Old Jeezy. Old Wheezy.”

 

Metaphor:

Source:

Target:

What does this metaphor do?

Consider the Lobster

6)      And it’s true that they [lobsters] are garbagemen of the sea, eaters of dead stuff,4 although they’ll also eat some live shellfish, certain kinds of injured fish, and sometimes each other.

 

Metaphor:

Source:

Target:

What does this metaphor do?

 

7)      The basic scenario is that we come in from the store and make our little preparations like getting the kettle filled and boiling, and then we lift the lobsters out of the bag or whatever retail container they came home in …whereupon some uncomfortable things start to happen. However stuporous the lobster is from the trip home, for instance, it tends to come alarmingly to life when placed in boiling water. If you’re tilting it from a container into the steaming kettle, the lobster will sometimes try to cling to the container’s sides or even to hook its claws over the kettle’s rim like a person trying to keep from going over the edge of a roof. And worse is when the lobster’s fully immersed. Even if you cover the kettle and turn away, you can usually hear the cover rattling and clanking as the lobster tries to push it off. Or the creature’s claws scraping the sides of the kettle as it thrashes around. The lobster, in other words, behaves very much as you or I would behave if we were plunged into boiling water (with the obvious exception of screaming).

 

Metaphor:

Source:

Target:

What does this metaphor do?



Friday 20 February 2015

Composition Notebooks: Creative Nonfiction


James Baldwin
A bit of artistic inspiration: James Baldwin.
Since we did not get to the final part of the nonfiction activities yesterday, I would like to wrap it up today.

A) In your composition notebooks, write a short "nonfiction" piece that emulates one of these styles. Tell me which piece you are attempting to recreate. Feel free to write about whatever your heart desires. Here are some prompts you could work with:

  1. Discuss one glaring social issue. Why is it a problem? How should it be remedied?
  2. Describe a person who has had a large impact on your life but is no longer in contact with you. Why is this person important? Where did they go? Do you miss this person?
  3. Review a recent film, television show, video game, or book.
  4. Tell a story from your childhood.
B) Please also write a short rationale. Which piece of writing did you choose to emulate? What specific aspects of the piece's style or voice are you attempting to mirror?

If you complete the activity before the end of class, please place your composition notebook on my desk and quietly work on your nonfiction projects.

Thursday 19 February 2015

More Voice

Brain Drop:

Listen to this story. This time, do not close your eyes. Instead, write anything you notice about how the story is told. Do you notice any framing devices? Try imaging what this story would like look as a written text. (Note: if you click the link, you can actually read the transcript.) Please write your notes in your composition notebooks. What genre would you call this piece? Yes, nonfiction, but be more specific. What about the Gavagan piece from yesterday?

Once the story is completed, chat with a classmate next to you. What did they notice? Write their observations in your composition notebook as well. (Note: I want to see everyone participating. I will look for evidence of engagement here, so do make sure you note who you are chatting with.)

Florence Foster Jenkins

Wednesday 18 February 2015

An Immaculate Essay

 
Does this essay adhere to proper MLA form?
 

Nonfiction: Dissecting Voice

Brain Drop: Close your eyes and listen to this story by Ed Gavagan for The Moth. Attempt to bring the tale vividly to life in your mind. Pay close attention to Gavagan's voice as a storyteller. What techniques does Gavagan utilize to enhance his narrative?  After the story, freewrite about these techniques in your composition notebooks. Please attempt to include an analysis of any literary devices or figurative language Gavagan utilizes.

Nick Cave

The introduction of John Doran's review "Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds Reissues: The First Four Are Dead Good" for The Quietus:

"Murder. We're all attracted to it in one way or another and Nick Cave is certainly no exception. John Doran revels in the first four Bad Seeds reissues.

It is Sunday afternoon, preferably before the war. The 'life-partner' is already asleep in the armchair, and the children have been sent out to play next to the burnt-out car at the end of the estate. You put your feet up on the futon, turn on your Power Book and log on to the net. Cracked parsnips on a raft of sky-blushed polenta, or free-range squid with quince marmalade, followed up by gluten free sorbet and driven home, as it were, by a cup of mahogany-brown, fair-trade tea, have put you in just the right mood. In these blissful circumstances, what is it that you want to hear about?

Naturally, about a murder. But what kind of murder? If one examines the murders which have given the greatest amount of pleasure to the music listening public, one finds a fairly strong family resemblance running through the greater number of them. We don't want to hear about the actual reality of murder. You know, like that guy from down the road, who got stabbed to death outside the launderette after asking some youths to stop throwing stones at him. Or that fellow who came in from the pub pissed and beat his kids to death with a golf club. No, we want to hear about more intellectually and morally nourishing slayings. Biblical brothers, lovestruck ladies dressed in black, thunder-faced cowboys hell-bent on revenge, drunken preachers. Girls that you love so much, you have to stove their heads in with a rock. That kind of thing.

And some would say, now that Johnny Cash is dead, well, Nick Cave's your man, isn't he?"

Click here for the full review.

Click here for an example of the music of Nick Cave and The Bad Seeds.

Click here for an example of the music of Johnny Cash.

Fun Fact: Nick Cave and Warren Ellis (members of Nick Cave and The Bad Seeds) wrote and preformed the soundtrack for The Road film. Nick Cave also wrote the screenplay for the film The Proposition. The Proposition was directed by John Hillcoat (the director of The Road) and stars Guy Guy Pearce. Guy Pearce plays the man the little boy encounters at the end of The Road.

DFW and his famous bandanna. Fun Fact: David Foster Wallace taught at ISU.

An excerpt from David Foster Wallace's "Consider the Lobster," a piece for Gourmet magazine concerning the writer's visit to the Maine Lobster Fest:

...

“So then here is a question that’s all but unavoidable at the World’s Largest Lobster Cooker, and may arise in kitchens across the U.S.: Is it all right to boil a sentient creature alive just for our gustatory pleasure? A related set of concerns: Is the previous question irksomely PC or sentimental? What does “all right” even mean in this context? Is it all just a matter of individual choice?”



“The more important point here, though, is that the whole animal-cruelty-and-eating issue is not just complex, it’s also uncomfortable. It is, at any rate, uncomfortable for me, and for just about everyone I know who enjoys a variety of foods and yet does not want to see herself as cruel or unfeeling. As far as I can tell, my own main way of dealing with this conflict has been to avoid thinking about the whole unpleasant thing. I should add that it appears to me unlikely that many readers of gourmet wish to think hard about it, either, or to be queried about the morality of their eating habits in the pages of a culinary monthly. Since, however, the assigned subject of this article is what it was like to attend the 2003 MLF [Maine Lobster Fest], and thus to spend several days in the midst of a great mass of Americans all eating lobster, and thus to be more or less impelled to think hard about lobster and the experience of buying and eating lobster, it turns out that there is no honest way to avoid certain moral questions.

There are several reasons for this. For one thing, it’s not just that lobsters get boiled alive, it’s that you do it yourself—or at least it’s done specifically for you, on-site.13 As mentioned, the World’s Largest Lobster Cooker, which is highlighted as an attraction in the Festival’s program, is right out there on the MLF’s north grounds for everyone to see. Try to imagine a Nebraska Beef Festival14 at which part of the festivities is watching trucks pull up and the live cattle get driven down the ramp and slaughtered right there on the World’s Largest Killing Floor or something—there’s no way.

The intimacy of the whole thing is maximized at home, which of course is where most lobster gets prepared and eaten (although note already the semiconscious euphemism “prepared,” which in the case of lobsters really means killing them right there in our kitchens). The basic scenario is that we come in from the store and make our little preparations like getting the kettle filled and boiling, and then we lift the lobsters out of the bag or whatever retail container they came home in …whereupon some uncomfortable things start to happen. However stuporous the lobster is from the trip home, for instance, it tends to come alarmingly to life when placed in boiling water. If you’re tilting it from a container into the steaming kettle, the lobster will sometimes try to cling to the container’s sides or even to hook its claws over the kettle’s rim like a person trying to keep from going over the edge of a roof. And worse is when the lobster’s fully immersed. Even if you cover the kettle and turn away, you can usually hear the cover rattling and clanking as the lobster tries to push it off. Or the creature’s claws scraping the sides of the kettle as it thrashes around. The lobster, in other words, behaves very much as you or I would behave if we were plunged into boiling water (with the obvious exception of screaming).15 A blunter way to say this is that the lobster acts as if it’s in terrible pain, causing some cooks to leave the kitchen altogether and to take one of those little lightweight plastic oven timers with them into another room and wait until the whole process is over.”


“In any event, at the Festival, standing by the bubbling tanks outside the World’s Largest Lobster Cooker, watching the fresh-caught lobsters pile over one another, wave their hobbled claws impotently, huddle in the rear corners, or scrabble frantically back from the glass as you approach, it is difficult not to sense that they’re unhappy, or frightened, even if it’s some rudimentary version of these feelings …and, again, why does rudimentariness even enter into it? Why is a primitive, inarticulate form of suffering less urgent or uncomfortable for the person who’s helping to inflict it by paying for the food it results in? I’m not trying to give you a PETA-like screed here—at least I don’t think so. I’m trying, rather, to work out and articulate some of the troubling questions that arise amid all the laughter and saltation and community pride of the Maine Lobster Festival. The truth is that if you, the Festival attendee, permit yourself to think that lobsters can suffer and would rather not, the MLF can begin to take on aspects of something like a Roman circus or medieval torture-fest.”
Click here for the full article.

Click here for a David Foster Wallace biography.

r18773c
Here is another example of a spectacular nonfiction piece called "Trial by Fire: Did Texas Execute an Innocent Man?" The piece was originally published in The New Yorker and was written by David Grann.

"The fire moved quickly through the house, a one-story wood-frame structure in a working-class neighborhood of Corsicana, in northeast Texas. Flames spread along the walls, bursting through doorways, blistering paint and tiles and furniture. Smoke pressed against the ceiling, then banked downward, seeping into each room and through crevices in the windows, staining the morning sky.

Buffie Barbee, who was eleven years old and lived two houses down, was playing in her back yard when she smelled the smoke. She ran inside and told her mother, Diane, and they hurried up the street; that’s when they saw the smoldering house and Cameron Todd Willingham standing on the front porch, wearing only a pair of jeans, his chest blackened with soot, his hair and eyelids singed. He was screaming, “My babies are burning up!” His children—Karmon and Kameron, who were one-year-old twin girls, and two-year-old Amber—were trapped inside.

Willingham told the Barbees to call the Fire Department, and while Diane raced down the street to get help he found a stick and broke the children’s bedroom window. Fire lashed through the hole. He broke another window; flames burst through it, too, and he retreated into the yard, kneeling in front of the house. A neighbor later told police that Willingham intermittently cried, “My babies!” then fell silent, as if he had “blocked the fire out of his mind.”
 
Diane Barbee, returning to the scene, could feel intense heat radiating off the house. Moments later, the five windows of the children’s room exploded and flames “blew out,” as Barbee put it. Within minutes, the first firemen had arrived, and Willingham approached them, shouting that his children were in their bedroom, where the flames were thickest. A fireman sent word over his radio for rescue teams to “step on it.”
 
More men showed up, uncoiling hoses and aiming water at the blaze. One fireman, who had an air tank strapped to his back and a mask covering his face, slipped through a window but was hit by water from a hose and had to retreat. He then charged through the front door, into a swirl of smoke and fire. Heading down the main corridor, he reached the kitchen, where he saw a refrigerator blocking the back door.
 
Todd Willingham, looking on, appeared to grow more hysterical, and a police chaplain named George Monaghan led him to the back of a fire truck and tried to calm him down. Willingham explained that his wife, Stacy, had gone out earlier that morning, and that he had been jolted from sleep by Amber screaming, “Daddy! Daddy!”
 
“My little girl was trying to wake me up and tell me about the fire,” he said, adding, “I couldn’t get my babies out.”

Click here for the full article.


With your small groups:-Annotate the writing. Note anything that stands out. Please note any examples of figurative language, literary devices, rhetorical appeals, etc. (I want to see what you know.)

-What does the writer of your piece do stylistically and rhetorically? Talk about style and form.

-Do you expect "nonfiction" to look like your excerpt? Is the writers approach to "nonfiction" unique? Why?

-Do you like this piece? Does it work for you?

End of class:

In your composition notebooks, write a short "nonfiction" piece that emulates one of these styles. Tell me which piece you are attempting to recreate. Feel free to write about whatever your heart desires. Here are some prompts you could work with:


  1. Discuss one glaring social issue. Why is it a problem? How should it be remedied?
  2. Describe a person who has had a large impact on your life but is no longer in contact with you. Why is this person important? Where did they go? Do you miss this person?
  3. Review a recent film, television show, video game, or book.
  4. Tell a story from your childhood.




Tuesday 17 February 2015

A Very Quick Note on Grammar and Cormac McCarthy

Brain Drop: 
Free write about one of these prompts for 5 minutes.

Is it acceptable to pronounce the word ask like the word ax? Why?
 
How do you speak when you are kicking it with the homies? How do you speak when you are at school? Are they different? If so, why?

 
A Young Cormac McCarthy

 
In some of the exit slips about The Road and Cormac McCarthy's aesthetic, I noticed that there was a tendency to brand McCarthy's grammar "incorrect" or "improper."  

I know that this may shock you to hear from an English teacher: there is no such thing as incorrect grammar (in Mr. Wermeling's not-so-humble opinion).

Here is why:

First, watch this video.
 
Then, ask yourself this: Why do we have language? What does language do?

Generally speaking, language serves two functions:


1) Communication

2) Expression of Identity

·         Unlike other languages (including French and Italian), English does not have a language academy. There is no authoritative body that decides what is "right" and "wrong" to say in English. The only "institutions" that prevail are social flights of fancy.

·         Language is not fixed. Language is always changing across time and space, and there is not much humanity can do about it. What is "improper" today will likely become "the norm" tomorrow.

             Consider the selfie.
Norman Rockwell's epic selfie: Triple Self-Portrait
 
Another example of our changing language:

A notable feature of what linguists call African American English is S-cluster metathesis of final consonant clusters starting with /s.  

Ask
→ /ˈæks/  (so "ask" becomes "axe")
 
 
Some uptight weirdos may find this linguistic trait offensive or incorrect, arguing that it is a crass deviation from “standard English” (whatever "standard English" means). 


This is breathtakingly clever. Thank you for telling me how to speak correctly, Lord of Language.

It may surprise you to learn that Geoffrey Chaucer, "The Father of English Literature" and the greatest English poet of the Middle Ages, used “ax” in the same way.

"Ax Chaucer Aboute His Sweet Horse" 


This brings us to another point:
 
Frequently, grammar is used as a way to enforce racist, classist, and regionalist sentiments, often having nothing to do with clarity of language or coherence.  (Think about it: we call uptight grammarians “grammar Nazis” for a reason.) Remember: language is an expression of identity and thus an expression of culture. Just as the notion of "purity of culture" is deeply problematic, so to is the notion of "purity of language."

Here is a piece from NPR about "ax" as it was used by Chaucer and others.  

            As Fry noted, all of this is not to say that we should descend into linguistic anarchy. We “dress up” our language in various discourse contexts, including the academic realm and the workplace. When I prepare to teach a class, I dress up. I throw on my dainty pair of burnt sienna wingtips, my signature faux-prep sweater, and my slick socks. When I get dressed in the morning, I am attempting to cultivate my ethos as an educator and as an intellectual. In class, I dress up my language too.

For better or worse, your precision of language is deeply connected to your ethos, not just as a writer or student or employee, but as a person.

 
 
There are two ways to look at grammar:

·         Prescriptive: a set of rules and examples dealing with the syntax and word structures of a language, usually intended as an aid to the learning of that language. Prescriptive grammar refers to the structure of a language as certain people think it should be used.

·         Descriptive: the systematic study and description of a language. Descriptive grammar refers to the structure of a language as it is actually used by speakers and writers.

Which school of thought do you think Mr. Wermeling abides by?

 

Friday 13 February 2015

MLA Resources

I require you adhere to MLA formatting for the nonfiction unit paper.

Here is what your first page will look like: 

 
NOTE:
 
Your last name and the page number will be the header on the right.
 
The order of the information on the left:
1) Your Name
2) The Instructor's Name
3) The Course Title
4) The Date
 
The font is Times New Roman, 12 point.
 
The title of your essay is centered and THAT'S IT! No goofy font or bizarre sizing.  
 
The text is double spaced.
 
The margins are standard 1 inch.
 
Names of longer texts are italicized. (Films, novels, albums, etc.)

Names of shorter texts are in quotes. (Stories, television episodes, songs, etc.)
 
In-text citations will look like Exhibit A: (Author's Last Name and Page #). 
 

Your Works Cited page will look like this.

Feel free to use citation generator sites like easybib for your Works Cited page. Please check the websites work before you submit your essay. 


  • If you need any additional assistance with MLA style and formatting, try this link.
  • If you have any concerns regarding the nonfiction unit, email me: qwermeli@hinsdale86.org
  • I am available 5th period (my lunch), 7th and 8th period (in writing lab, click to book an appointment), and 10th period (in the English Department Office).

Good luck!

Susan Sontag

A Valentine from Mr. Wermeling


Nonfiction Book Independent Study

Final Deadline: Monday, March 9th

            With this unit, all students will be responsible for the completion of two tasks, each worth 70 points a pop:

1.      An analysis essay exploring a critical notion of your selected text. Your essay should examine some novel or interesting concept by furthering the ideas explored in your selected nonfiction book. Think of this essay as part of the larger discourse community; with this essay, you are entering your voice into a global discussion. As such, your essay should say something new, avant-garde, cutting-edge, or unique. Do not write this essay as if it is just something you “have to do” -- seize upon a specific concern in your nonfiction text and really dive into it. If it helps, try imagining that you are composing this paper for publication in a specific context, like a blog, magazine, or academic journal. Consider making intertextual connections to other books, films, paintings, websites, or other relevant works. As you compose your essay, it may be helpful to ask yourself this question: “What function does my essay serve?” Your essay must be at least 4 pages long. All essays must adhere to standard MLA formatting: 1’’ margins, 12 point Time New Roman font, double spaced, a works cited page, etc. Failure to adhere to proper MLA form will negatively impact your grade. Your paper will be worth a cool 70 points.

2.      A creative project of your design with a one page rationale. This project can truly be ANYTHING, as long as it meaningfully responds to your selected nonfiction text. Reading a historical account of a famous battle? Create a historically accurate diorama. Reading a US president’s autobiography? Write your own autobiography, mimicking or referencing the style of the president. Reading a book about a famous film director’s revolutionary aesthetic? Create a short film that emulates key stylistic qualities of the auteur. Reading a book about the intricacies of the theatre? Write a one act play that shows off what you have learned. Reading a scientific account of the impending environmental apocalypse? Devise a community service project and create a Tumblr blog to document your progress. Reading a chronicle of some bygone artistic movement? Create a painting that demonstrates your newfound knowledge. Reading an athlete’s inspiring story? Write a Sport Illustrated style feature with relevant timelines, photographs, and other graphics. The possibilities are endless. Please capitalize on this unique opportunity to be expressive, thoughtful, and creative. Once you have completed the project, write a one page rationale explaining why you decided to create your unique project and how it meaningfully responds to your text. Your rationale should be single spaced. No MLA style heading is necessary for your rationale. March 9th will be dedicated to the sharing of projects. You may “share” your project however you see fit. Monday’s project sharing could mean simply reading your one page rationale, or it could mean preforming a postmodern rendition of Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring on the Nintendo DS in front of the class. Once again, the possibilities are endlessly endless. The project and rationale will also be worth 70 points in total.    

Together, the work you complete for this nonfiction unit will equal 140 points.
 
A painting by Henri Fantin-Latour
 

Thursday 5 February 2015

Nonfiction Book Ideas

Are you having trouble deciding what nonfiction book to read for class?

Click here for Time magazine's list of the 100 best nonfiction books of all time.

Click here for The Guardian newspaper list of greatest nonfiction books.

Click here for the New York Times "Combined Print & E-Book Nonfiction Bestseller List" as of February 8th, 2015.

Click here for More magazine's "The Top 100 Books Every Woman Should Read" list.

Click here for the The Root list of the 15 Best Nonfiction Books by Black Authors in 2014.

Below are a few choice cuts from the Time list. (All book blurbs were written for the Time list and were not created by Mr. Wermeling.)

* denotes a Mr. Wermeling Personal Favorite 

A HEARTBREAKING WORK OF STAGGERING GENIUS
A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius

It may seem arrogant to refer to one’s first published book as a Work of Staggering Genius, but in Dave Eggers’s case, the truth is in the pages. The Pulitzer Prize nominated memoir, published in 2000, is easy to get lost in with its conversational narrative that’s at once paranoid and adept, casual yet sincere. And while it is heartbreaking to witness the deterioration of an otherwise unremarkable suburban family, as both Eggers’ parents succumb to cancer within a span of 32 days, the book is also undeniably uplifting and succeeds as an honest (if partly fictionalized) portrayal of the strength of family in the face of adversity. Eggers excels at conveying the weight of the burden laid upon him when, at age 21, he accepts the role of parent to his 8-year-old brother Toph. Though his “new model” parenting methods might not be considered normal by society’s standards, Eggers doesn’t hide from the fact that nothing about his and his brother’s situation is “normal.” Instead, he demands that the universe repay him and Toph for the heartache they’ve endured. Eleven years, six books, a successful publishing imprint and numerous nonprofits later, it seems that Eggers has been repaid in full.

A MOVEABLE FEAST

Ernest Hemingway begins his memoir of Paris in the 1920s with a scene from autumn, when “all the sadness of the city came suddenly with the first cold rains of winter.” It’s a mood that returns when he leaves Paris at the end of the book, his first marriage in shambles but his faith in the transformative power of the city intact. In between, we relive his heady encounters with Gertrude Stein, his friendship with F. Scott Fitzgerald, warm days in the Jardin du Luxembourg and walks along cramped and ancient streets where goatherds still ply their trade, calling for customers to come down with pots and milk the animals. It was a Paris of another time, not just for modern readers but for Hemingway: he wrote the book in the 1950s, long after he’d left France and not long before he died in 1961. Reading it can be a wistful experience, but as he says on the last page, “Paris was always worth it.

THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MALCOLM X
The Autobiography of Malcolm X, as told to Alex Haley

During Alex Haley’s interview sessions with Malcolm X, the then spokesman for the Nation of Islam scribbled notes on small pieces of paper. Eventually Haley would use them to form his autobiography and the basis of much of the study of his character.
The book begins with his description of his tumultuous childhood and takes the reader into his youth in Harlem’s heyday. It also places him inside the criminal underworld, in prison and finally in the center of the civil rights movement. The prose follows Malcolm X’s direct manner of speaking to ensure that readers see his life through his eyes and is gripping enough to capture both subject and environment.
Malcolm X predicted that he would not live to see its publication, a prophecy fulfilled as friction between himself and the Nation of Islam, and a subsequent falling-out culminated in his 1965 assassination. But the pages chronicling the years leading up to it reveal the world of a man who had gone from being a hustler to being one of history’s most controversial civil rights icons."

FAST FOOD NATION
Fast Food Nation

“I aimed for the public’s heart,” wrote Upton Sinclair, referring to his muckraking hit The Jungle, “and by accident, I hit it in the stomach.” When Eric Schlosser came out with Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal in 2001, it was hailed as a modern-day Jungle, and with good reason. The book’s most memorable sections pull back the veil of the fast-food infrastructure and reveal the horrific conditions of modern American slaughterhouses — both for the cattle who were eviscerated in bloody fashion and for the immigrant labor force paid too little for work that was too dangerous.
But it would be a mistake to treat Fast Food Nation as just another piece of stomach-turning, muckraking literature. Schlosser did far more, connecting the rise and consolidation of the fast-food industry in America to the declining power of labor unions, sliding blue-collar wages and growing income inequality. “The basic thinking behind fast food has become the operating system of today’s retail economy,” writes Schlosser. We all live in Fast Food Nation.

AGAINST INTERPRETATION AND OTHER ESSASYS
against_interpretation
Among her many identities — novelist, playwright, film director and human-rights activist — Susan Sontag was perhaps most widely known as a searing intellectual. Her first work of nonfiction, Against Interpretation, published in 1966, was a sweeping assessment of art and contemporary culture — as well as an instant classic. With her insatiable appetite for creativity in all its forms, Sontag produces a collection of essays that is an ambitious work. Discussing everything from Sartre to camp, Godard to science fiction — the highbrow-lowbrow distinction wasn’t one that Sontag was concerned with — the book aimed to be a critique of modern thinking about art. In the title essay, Sontag makes the case against overintellectualizing art. Rather than dissect art and its context and consequently eviscerate its beauty, she argues that the beauty of art should be appreciated for what it is. The book was an immediate hit and established Sontag as an influential cultural critic.

A SUPPOSEDLY FUN THING I'LL NEVER DO AGAIN*
a_supposedly_fun_thing
David Foster Wallace has been the recipient of so much praise since his death in 2008 that perhaps it’s best to contribute a gripe. Wallace is a disquieting read. Not just because of the acid insights or creeping melancholy, but because his mastery of language and powers of observation so dwarf our own. This 1997 collection of essays features some of the writer’s best, including a dispatch from the set of a David Lynch movie (where Wallace never gets closer to Lynch than a glimpse of his subject peeing), a piece from the Illinois State Fair (“the air like wet wool”), the title meditation on the existential sadness of luxury cruises (maid service complete with “a creeping guilt, a deep accretive uneasiness, a discomfort that presents … a weird kind of pampering-paranoia”) and a profile of middling tennis pro Michael Joyce that eclipses his better-known essay on tour ace Roger Federer. This is Wallace at the top of his game.

BURY MY HEART AT WOUNDED KNEE*
bury_my_heart_at_wounded_knee

Drawing on government records and first-person accounts, Brown exposed how the U.S. government sought systematically to destroy the American Indian in the late 19th century. Beginning with the forced relocation of the Navajo in 1864 and ending with the massacre of the Sioux at Wounded Knee in 1890, Brown revealed the broken treaties, condescending diplomacy and discriminatory policies that helped extend America’s border to the Pacific. Published in 1970, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee attracted some criticism from scholars, who called it one-sided, but Brown didn’t care. To lay out how the West was really won, he wrote, it was necessary to approach history from a new direction: “Americans who have always looked westward when reading about this period should read this book facing eastward.”

THE HERO WITH A THOUSAND FACES
The Hero with a Thousand Faces

Since its publication in 1949, Joseph Campbell’s seminal work on the archetypal heroes and myths shared by world religions and traditions has focused countless artists and academics on our cultural commonalities rather than our differences. Legend has it that George Lucas used Campbell’s book as a foundation for his Star Wars trilogy. Harry Potter also closely hews to the classic hero’s journey that Campbell drew from ancient allegories in dozens of cultures and codified into one rollicking human epic, a universal saga that he referred to as the monomyth and that, he argued, sits deep in our subconscious, woven into all our rituals, from marriage to burial. A prolific author and editor, he believed that people need these superhuman figures because they are “the symbols that carry the human spirit forward.” But in a wistful last chapter, he noted that modernity has devalued this collective consciousness in favor of self-expression and a fragmented culture tilted toward science and economics. In his view, we are enriched and supported when we embrace the “oneness of the individual and the group.” Today that bond is frayed. “The lines of communication between the conscious and unconscious zones of the human psyche have all been cut,” Campbell wrote, “and we have been split in two.”

LET US NOW PRAISE FAMOUS MEN*

Former TIME magazine movie critic James Agee (who reviewed films, in the memorable words of writer David Thompson, “like someone who had not just viewed the movie but been in it — out with it, as if it were a girl; drinking with it; driving in the night with it”) may be best known for writing a book that sprang from a FORTUNE assignment that, ironically, never ran. In 1936, Agee and photographer Walker Evans were sent to the Deep South to document the travails of sharecropping cotton farmers, three years into Roosevelt’s New Deal.
By turns captivating and exhausting (the third sentence lasts 16 lines), Let Us Now Praise Famous Men tells the story of three families. Agee states that his mission is to “pry intimately into the lives of an undefended and appallingly damaged group of human beings,” and pry he does, but he also ruminates about poverty, farming, animals and racism, all supplemented by Evans’ stark black-and-white images.
Hardly anyone read the book on its original publication in 1941. It wasn’t until 1960, when it was reissued after Agee’s death, that it garnered recognition and its stylistic influence rubbed off on the likes of Norman Mailer and Hunter S. Thompson. In 2001 the New York Public Library declared it one of the most influential books of the 20th century.

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES
A People's History of the United States

Howard Zinn’s People’s History, first published in 1980, is a story of America through the lens of the oppressed. It’s a rethinking of history, a narrative you almost certainly didn’t read in school. From Columbus’ voyage to President Bush’s “war on terror” (he revised the book in 2003), Zinn writes through the writings of others: factory workers, union leaders, blacks, Native Americans, the men who went off to war and the women who took their places. While Zinn’s recurring focus on the labor movement is often criticized, it’s important to note he wasn’t simply a historian. He was a social activist who fought for those without a voice. Zinn’s history isn’t a textbook and sometimes doesn’t even feel like a history book. It’s just a brilliantly written story about the U.S. through the lives of those too often overlooked.
IN COLD BLOOD

In Cold Blood

The seed from which Capote’s genre-bending 1966 book grew was a newspaper blurb about the grisly murder of a Kansas farmer and his family. Intrigued, Capote spent years digging into the context and aftermath of the crime, interviewing the killers and recreating the carnage. In Cold Blood blurred the line between fact and fiction, laying the foundation for the New Journalism later practiced by Tom Wolfe. But apart from its role in forging a new branch of literature, the book also stands on its own as a masterpiece of reportage. Though critics claim Capote took creative license, the book is nonetheless a meticulously crafted account of a heinous killing — one as gripping to readers as it was to its author.

NICKEL AND DIMED
Nickel and Dimed

“I can’t imagine getting involved in a problem as a journalist and not wanting to do something about it,” wrote Ehrenreich of her activist brand of investigative journalism. Published in 2001, Nickel and Dimed was a response to the rhetoric surrounding welfare reform — namely, the notion that unskilled jobs could lift people out of poverty. Ehrenreich (who also has a Ph.D. in cellular biology) suspected differently. So she went undercover as a waitress in Florida, a maid in Maine and a store clerk in Minnesota, working alongside impoverished people with few options. Outraged but never sanctimonious, she spotlighted the vulnerability of wage workers — and how all of us are implicated when we accept the benefits of cheap labor.


Other Ideas: